Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from Correlational Research for Evidence-Based Practice

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Investigating the Unique Predictors of Word-Problem Solving Using Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling (2020, methodology): “I coded the study quality on six indicators adapted from the quality indicators for correlational research developed by Thompson et al. (2005).”
What Works, When, for Whom, and With Whom (2016, background): “, employment, education, independent living, and productivity); (f) are methodological features of studies associated with outcomes, including statistical design, length of follow up, and overall quality as determined by widely used criteria (Thompson et al., 2005); (g) do gender, ethnicity, and dis”
Secondary Transition Predictors of Postschool Success: An Update to the Research Base (2020, methodology): “In addition, this review only included peer-reviewed, methodologically sound correlational studies that met the quality indicators for correlational research (Thompson et al., 2005).”
Predictors of Post-School Success (2016, methodology): “The 14 articles that met preliminary inclusion criteria were then reviewed to evaluate quality of research using a 15-item checklist for correlational research (Test et al., 2009; Thompson et al., 2005).”