COVID-19 restrictions and consumers’ psychological reactance toward offline shopping freedom restoration

By Naeem Akhtar, Muhammad Nadeem Akhtar, Muhammad Usman, Moazzam Ali, Umar Iqbal Siddiqi. 2020

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic threats and its subsequent restrictions on people's freedom, social interaction, closures of workplaces and shopping stores have caused public psychological reactance. In response, the study develops and tests a conceptual framework, which unveils the effects of perceived choice hesitation and perceived choice confidence on consumers’ psychological reactance. It also corroborates two bipolar behavioral outcomes of consumers’ psychological reactance— choice freedom satisfaction and resistance to persuasion. We employ the moderating role of anticipated worry and trust in government in strengthening the psychological reactance and final behavioral outcomes, respectively. Data collected from the country of origin of COVID-19 pandemic indicated the positive effects of antecedents on psychological reactance, which negatively affected choice freedom satisfaction and positively to resistance to persuasion. Anticipated worry and trust in government positively moderated these relationships. Findings extend the literature on psychology, service management, and consumer behavior, and suggest to government policymakers and store managers.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c26f201d67ea1a948d0f20c1ff634b278abc93bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. S. Rovai
  2. J. Koch
  3. B. Frommeyer
  4. Michelle Willis
  5. Kerry E. Howell
  6. Wilson Ozuem
  7. Silvia Ranfagni
  8. Gerhard Schewe

Citations in the corpus