State mood, task performance, and behavior at work: A within-persons approach

By Andrew G. Miner, Theresa M. Glomb. 2010

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1f580fccbc64d99a3264487a9fb4542683eb165

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, background): “Notably, however, research has linked state affect to higher levels of task performance (e.g., Miner & Glomb, 2010; Tsai, Chen, & Liu, 2007), an effect that may be partially attributable to the impact of affect on both task attentional pull and off-task attentional demands (Beal, Weiss, Barros, &…”
A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations (2012, background): “…has often noted that individuals have multiple motives, or goals, in mind when engaging in OCBs (Bolino, 1999; Grant, Parker, & Collins, 2009; Rioux & Penner, 2001) and that there is intra-individual variance in citizenship performance over time (Ilies, Scott, & Judge, 2006; Miner & Glomb, 2010).”
Contemplating Mindfulness at Work (2016, background): “Reb et al. (2014) found leaders’ trait mindfulness was positively associated with employees’ work-life balance, job satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and job performance and negatively related to employee exhaustion and deviance; psychological need satisfaction mediated many of these…”
Does Happiness Promote Career Success? Revisiting the Evidence (2018, methodology): “Additionally, an experience sampling method (ESM) study—in which employees indicated their mood repeatedly throughout the work day—found that positive moods were marginally associated with more prosociality (Miner & Glomb, 2010).”
To Invest or Not? The Role of Coworker Support and Trust in Daily Reciprocal Gain Spirals of Helping Behavior (2015, background): “For example, in light of the relationship between mood, both state and trait, on helping behavior (e.g., Johnson, Tolentino, Rodopman, & Cho, 2010; Miner & Glomb, 2010), it would seem valuable for researchers to consider these variables in future research.”
Can personality traits and daily positive mood buffer the harmful effects of daily negative mood on task performance and service sabotage? A self-control perspective (2015, background): “…found that negative mood (e.g., distressed, hostile, nervous, or upset) leads to unfavorable performance outcomes, such as reducing task performance or increasing counterproductive work behaviors (Judge, Scott, & Ilies, 2006; Miner & Glomb, 2010; Rothbard & Wilk, 2011; Yang & Diefendorff, 2009).”
Linking Lighting Appraisals to Work Behaviors (2013, background): “The importance of this to workplaces has several dimensions, from influence on social behavior (Baron, 1990; Baron & Thomley, 1994) to cognitive performance (Baron, 1990; Baron & Thomley, 1994; Miner & Glomb, 2010).”
Waking Up on the Right or Wrong Side of the Bed: Start-of-Workday Mood, Work Events, Employee Affect, and Performance (2011, background): “First, we examine a broader range of organizational performance metrics, including several measures of productivity as well as of quality of service (cf. Miner & Glomb, 2010; Totterdell, 1999, 2000).”