Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE Data
By J. Igalens, Jean‐Pascal Gond. 2005
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1d86e701b00695d61798f9c3515f976183cf232
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Hasan Fauzi
- Göran Svensson
- Azhar A. Rahman
- Rupert J. Baumgartner
- D. Ebner
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- Patricia Crifo
- Christopher Marquis
In Strategy and Management
- Hasan Fauzi
- Göran Svensson
- Azhar A. Rahman
- Christopher Marquis
- Rupert J. Baumgartner
- D. Ebner
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- A. Crane
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Financial Crisis in Corporate Social Responsibility Performance (2011, unknown): “Igalens and Gond (2005) state that there are five different methodologies for measuring CSR performance.”
- The relationship between Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility (2006, background): “Jenkins, 2004 understands CSR as a concept which makes it possible for companies to “frame their attitudes and strategies towards, and relationships with, stakeholders, be they investors, employees or communities, within a popular acceptable concept.” This concept also includes environmental commitm”
- A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead (2008, unknown): “The reasons for inconclusive findings may stem from measurement errors, model misspecification and insufficient scope of the data set (Igalens and Gond 2005), which may be solved in the future.”
- CSR and financial performance: complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours (2014, background): “Igalens and Gond (2005) compare KLD and Vigeo data and quote few differences explained mainly by different cultural sensitivities.”
- “Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future (2010, methodology): “Igalen and Gond [45] summarized the measurement approaches of CSP,”
- Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico (2010, unknown): “…of CSP from the few studies available at the time that reported specific performance levels (Chapple and Moon, 2005; Deaken and Whittaker, 2007; Igalens and Gond, 2005; Matten and Moon, 2008), or developed indicators from measures used 15 in assessments by KLD (2005), DJSI (2007) and GRI…”
- Corporate Social Performance Disoriented: Saving the Lost Paradigm? (2010, background): “For reviews and critiques of CSP measures in this literature, see Wokutch and McKinney (1991), Wood and Jones (1995), Griffin and Mahon (1997), Preston and O’Bannon (1997), Roman, Hayibor, and Agle (1999), Rowley and Berman (2000), Margolis and Walsh (2001a).”
- Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action (2007, background): “Similar to KLD in the US, social rating agencies exist in a number of countries (e.g. ARESE in France (Igalens & Gond, 2005)) and so a cross-national comparison of corporate social activities is an eminently researchable topic.”