A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead

By Min-Dong Paul Lee. 2008

1,404 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ae51ad6a5bfd898c8310c7c41e8fddbe8cdc1ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies (2018, background): “The summary presented in Table 1 and the other empirical research [64,65] show that the relationship between them has been studied in both directions, both as dependent variables and as independent variables.”
Extending Corporate Social Responsibility Research to the Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior Domains: A Look to the Future (2013, background): “…normative and cultural-cognitive elements that are shaped by society, consumers, and stakeholders external to the firm; Scott, 1995) and, more recently, at the organizational level of analysis (Lee, 2008), with several studies addressing the relationship between CSR and firm financial performance.”
Corporate social responsibility in tourism small and medium enterprises evidence from Europe and Latin America (2013, background): “However, the same literature has not been conclusive on this relationship, finding positive neutral and negative associations (Griffin & Mahon, 1997; Margolis & Walsh, 2001) and has even been criticized by an excessive bias considering CSR only as a business case (M. Lee, 2008).”
Corporate social responsibility: Evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives (2016, background): “In the eighties, as Carroll (1999), Garriga and Melé (2004) and Lee (2008) reflect, there is a great theoretical dispersion that aims at analyzing the benefits and advantages of implementing actions in terms of social responsibility by firms.”
Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages (2016, methodology): “Developing the CSR dilemma model There is no common definition of what is meant by “CSR” (Carroll, 2008; Crane, McWilliams, Matten, Moon, & Siegel, 008; Lee, 2008; Marrewijk, 2003).”
Time for Reflection: A Critical Examination of Polychronicity (2010, background): “…young fields of inquiry struggle with definitional and measurement issues (Kuhn, 1962); examples of such young fields might include areas of international business (DuBois & Reeb, 2000), green advertising (Zinkhan & Carlson, 1995), and corporate social responsibility (M.-D. P. Lee, 2008).”
ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect (2011, background): “Moreover, within this stakeholder theory the difference between the social and economic goals of a corporation is no longer relevant, because the central issue is the survival of the corporation, and this survival is affected not only by shareholders, but also various other stakeholders such as empl”
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian Companies? (2010, background): “When stakeholders loose confidence in a firm’s performance, the firm loses its critical support structure and customer base (Lee, 2008).”