Exploring and Enhancing Spatial Thinking

By David H. Uttal, David I Miller, Nora S. Newcombe. 2013

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Education, Geography, Planning and Development

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c053d88a14ff2b6d7c097f6817179b473ce54842

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Glenda Andrews
2. David Reilly
3. David L. Neumann
4. Steven J. Holochwost
5. Kelly Fisher
6. Kristin Gagnier
7. Harpreet Kaur

In Education

1. Keith Jones
2. Nathalie Sinclair
3. Allen Leung
4. David Reilly
5. M. G. Bartolini Bussi
6. Ulrich Kortenkamp
7. David L. Neumann
8. Steven J. Holochwost

In Geography, Planning and Development

1. Glenda Andrews
2. David Reilly
3. David L. Neumann
4. Steven J. Holochwost
5. Kelly Fisher
6. Kristin Gagnier

Citations in the corpus

• Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report (2016, background): “Uttal et al. (2013) carried out a meta-analysis of 217 training studies and showed the malleability of spatial abilities and their effects.”
• Spatial thinking in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Elementary teachers' beliefs, perceptions, and self‐efficacy (2021, background): “For example, Cheng and Mix (2014) Gagnier & Fisher, 2020; Hegarty, 2014; Newcombe, 2010, 2013, 2017; Newcombe & Frick, 2010; Uttal & Cohen, 2012; Uttal et al., 2013; Wai & Uttal, 2018).”
• Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: Implications for STEM Education and Approaches to Reducing the Gender Gap for Parents and Educators (2017, background): “Uttal et al. (2013) considered a wide range of spatial training interventions, from explicit instruction and courses to playing video games and practising spatial tasks.”