DISCUSSION, COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE WORK AND EPISTEMIC FLUENCY

By Peter Goodyear, Maria Zenios. 2007

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc05a00126116c6221ff31dbdae2749467661542

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. A. Lipschuetz
2. Anindito Aditomo
3. Peter Goodyear
4. Robert A. Ellis
5. Mansureh Kebritchi
6. Lilia Santiague
7. Jeremy F. Strayer

In Education

1. A. Lipschuetz
2. Ana‐Maria Bliuc
3. Anindito Aditomo
4. Peter Goodyear
5. Robert A. Ellis
6. Mansureh Kebritchi
7. Lilia Santiague
8. D. Hendreș

Citations in the corpus

• Inquiry-based learning in higher education: principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations (2013, background): “Discussion of the value of this kind of objective is often linked to the need for epistemic fluency in contemporary knowledge work (Goodyear and Ellis 2007 ; Goodyear and Zenios 2007 ).”
• Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education (2017, background): “A strong sense of identity along with belonging to the knowledge community as a valued member plays a critical role in effective knowledge building (Goodyear & Zenios, 2007).”
• Understanding student learning in context: relationships between university students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic performance (2011, background): “Research suggests that the ways in which students understand and situate themselves in relation to their studies are associated with their perceptions of being part of a learning community, and also with identifying themselves as an emerging disciplinary specialist, or developing the skills and beli”