The impact of an alternative model of student teacher supervision: Views of the participants

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What characterises a good practicum in teacher education? (2011, background): “Researchers from the Netherlands, Australia and the USA talk about the power of “modelling” (Korthagen, Loughran and Russell, 2006; LaBoskey & Richert, 2002; Loughran, 2006; Loughran & Berry, 2005; Lunenberg, Korthagen & Swennen, 2007; Wilson, 2006).”
Critiquing Teacher Preparation Research (2015, background): “…to create more harmonious relationships among members of the triad and more powerful opportunities for teacher learning (e.g., Alger & Kopcha, 2011; Ballantyne & Mylonas, 2001; Cartaut & Bertone, 2009; Le Cornu, 2009; Ottessen, 2007; Rodgers & Keil, 2007; Smith & Avetisian, 2011; Wilson, 2006).”
An investigation of the nature of feedback given to pre‐service English teachers during their practice teaching experience (2010, background): “Some recent research has looked at the type of interaction and particularly the conversations during feedback sessions between student teachers, university supervisors or cooperating teachers (Lopes‐Real, Stimpson, and Bunton 2001 ; Orland 2001 ; Wilson 2006 ).”