A Structural and Process Analysis of the Implicit Association Test

By J. de Houwer. 2001

363 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba264ad024a231d5ad87133e472c3c40d0aa452a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Minority Members' Implicit Attitudes: Automatic Ingroup Bias As A Function Of Group Status (2002, background): “For example, De Houwer (2001) demonstrated similar levels of automatic ingroup bias in British subjects who completed IATs using either positive or negative exemplars of their group (as contrasted with negative or positive exemplars of foreigners, respectively).”
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “De Houwer (2001) pointed out that the typical IAT perfectly confounds the relevant and irrelevant feature possibilities; all exemplars of the positive target category (e.g., flowers) are themselves positive, and all exemplars of the negative target category (e.g., insects) are themselves negative.”
No Place for Nostalgia in Science: A Response to Arkes and Tetlock (2004, background): “For the IAT, an even larger number of explanations exists (e.g., see Brendl, Markman, & Messner, 2001; De Houwer, 2001; Mierke & Klauer, 2001; Rothermund & Wentura, 2004), and the IAT’s authors readily acknowledge that research to date “has not yet progressed enough to establish any theoretical in”
The influence of experimentally created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test (2006, methodology): “The Wndings of De Houwer (2001) , Olson and Fazio (2003), and Govan and Williams (2004) imply that the IAT does not measure the automatic activation of evaluations in response to exemplars, but rather, the association between the dual meanings of any given response option.”
Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity (2005, background): “…underlying IAT effects (Mierke & Klauer, 2003; Rothermund & Wentura, 2004), the effects of procedural features such as stimulus exemplars (De Houwer, 2001; Steffens & Plewe, 2001), situational and temporal stability (Blair, 2002; Schmukle & Egloff, in press), the relationship between…”
Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America (2002, background): “In a recent article, De Houwer (2001) argued that while the IAT is sensitive to category evaluations, this task is insensitive to the particular exemplars used to represent each category.”
Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, methodology): “For tasks involving a block structure and alternating response options (such as the IAT) stimulus-response compatibility (De Houwer, 2001), task switching (Klauer & Mierke, 2005), figure-ground asymmetry (Rothermund & Wentura, 2004), recoding (Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast, & Wentura, 2009),…”
The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes. (2007, methodology): “This risk is higher in the EAST than in the IAT because, unlike what is the case in the IAT, in the EAST, participants are not forced to encode the stimuli in terms of the target categories (see De Houwer, 2001, in press, for a discussion).”
TARGET ARTICLE: Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?" (2004, neutral): “De Houwer (2001) has shown that within an IAT paradigm, a participant’s responses to members of a category are driven largely by the participant’s evaluation of the category. Thus one’s evaluation of Princess Diana is heavily influenced by one’s evaluation of British. This feature of responding to t”
Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects (2006, methodology): “De Houwer (2001) examined implicit attitudes towards British and foreign people.”
Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. (2005, background): “While IAT effects are primarily driven by the category labels with individual exemplars influencing the construal of the category (De Houwer, 2001; Mitchell, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003; Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2005), it is important to avoid items that are confounded with other categories or are…”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, result): “Similar results have been obtained by other researchers (De Houwer, 2001, Fn. 4; Govan & Williams, 2004; J. P. Mitchell et al., 2003; Steffens & Plewe, 2001; Steffens et al., 2004).”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “For instance, De Houwer (2001) presented names of British and non-British (foreign) persons to British participants.”