Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.

By Brian A. Nosek. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2005

748 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f3b79fdce3d4cefcb4195069540ffbc9535412b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Implicit Race Attitudes Predicted Vote in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election (2009, background): “1 Very likely because of the sample’s limitation to persons who reported intention to vote, the sample also differed some from the population of 954,690 web visitors who completed race attitude IAT measures that were included in the overview report by Nosek, Smyth et al. (2007). For the latter, the ”
Reducing Implicit Prejudice (2013, background): “This variation may be explained in part by the social pressures against holding negative attitudes toward some groups and how much people have elaborated on those attitudes (Nosek, 2005).”
The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength (2007, background): “As might be expected then, the more elaboration an attitude object has received, the stronger the correlation be (Nosek, 2005).”
Paying Attention to Mindfulness and Its Effects on Task Performance in the Workplace (2011, background): “…a growing body of research demonstrates that other nonconsciously based phenomena, such as implicit attitudes, can be consciously accessed under particular conditions (e.g., Fazio & Olson, 2003; Gawronski, Hofmann, & Wilbur, 2006; Hofmann, Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005; Nosek, 2005).”
Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test (2007, background): “…(Blair, 2001; Fazio & Olson, 2003; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002), but it is moderated by theoretically expected variables, including attitude strength, social desirability, and measurement error (Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji, 2001; Karpinski, Steinman, & Hilton, 2005; Nosek, 2005).”
What moderates implicit—explicit consistency? (2005, methodology): “Unlike the multilevel analysis described above (Nosek, 2005), this study was limited to inferences across content domains because individual differences in cognitive elaboration were not assessed.”
Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification (2009, background): “Subscriber: Harvard University Library; date: 28 July 2014 their relation varies from weakly to strongly positive depending on the topic of assessment (Nosek, 2005).”
Predictive Validity of IAT Aggressiveness in the Context of Provocation (2010, background): “Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005; Nosek, 2005, for a review), this study points out”
What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. (2006, background): “Much of this research has been performed in the crucible of stereotyping and prejudice research, such as Jeff Sherman and colleagues’ Quad model (Conrey et al., 2005), the PDP model of Keith Payne and colleagues (Payne, Jacoby, & Lambert, 2005), and Brian Nosek’s (2005) work on the interaction of ex”
I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations (2007, background): “In this case, evaluative judgments will be independent of aVective reactions (see Hofmann, Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005; Nosek, 2005).”
Explicit Evidence on the Import of Implicit Attitudes: The IAT and Immigration Policy Judgments (2010, background): “15 By convention, scores of .2, .5, and .8 are considered small, moderate, and large, respectively (Nosek et al. 2005; Cohen 1988).”