The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.
By J. de Houwer, Els De Bruycker. 2007
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef25e3751cb42cf2ba3bd1ecdf20376bf301d92d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Social Psychology
- Jens B. Asendorpf
- A. Greenwald
- Roland Deutsch
- Konrad Schnabel
- Regina Krieglmeyer
- Bertram Gawronski
- Brian A. Nosek
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
In Sociology and Political Science
- Regina Krieglmeyer
- Roland Deutsch
- Konrad Schnabel
- A. Greenwald
- Jens B. Asendorpf
- Bertram Gawronski
- Brian A. Nosek
- J. de Houwer
Citations in the corpus
- Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task (2010, result): “Our reliability findings are in line with what has been reported in the domain of implicit attitude measures (De Houwer & De Bruycker, 2007a ; 2007b ) as well as in the domain of implicit self-concept measures (Teige, Schnabel, Banse, & Asendorpf, 2004 ).”
- Assessment of Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition A Review of IAT Measures (2008, methodology): “However, with few exceptions (Ellwart, Becker, & Rinck, 2005; Huijding & de Jong, 2005), internal consistencies of the EAST have proven to be rather unsatisfactory (De Houwer, 2003b; De Houwer & De Bruycker, 2007; Teige et al., 2004).”