The influence of experimentally created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Bias of Crowds: How Implicit Bias Bridges Personal and Systemic Prejudice (2017, background): “In another study, Han, Olson, and Fazio (2006) found that the uninformed preferences for Pok emon characters expressed by children influenced IAT evaluations of those characters.”
Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? (2006, methodology): “According to the arguments and evidence presented by Olson and Fazio (2004; see also Han et al, in press ), the personalised IAT is less sensitive to societal views.”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “For instance, Han et al. (2006) showed that an experimental manipulation of extrapersonal knowledge had an effect on a traditional IAT measure but did not have one on an affective priming measure or on a personalized IAT measure that was designed to minimize the impact of extrapersonal views.”
The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation (2008, background): “This difference in theoretical positions is made clear with opposing interpretations of a result reported by Han, Olson, and Fazio ( 2006 ).”
The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM (2013, background): “These beliefs are shaped by repeated exposure to more stereotypic than counterstereotypic messages in the environment (Han et al. 2006; Karpinski and Hilton 2001).”