Minority Members' Implicit Attitudes: Automatic Ingroup Bias As A Function Of Group Status

By Laurie A. Rudman, J. Feinberg, Kimberly Fairchild. 2002

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51362ce7fb805260ca27c7bb24fb63f0c1be6f5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. (2003, background): “A new focus on less explicit processes fits well with research demonstrating that system justification operates at implicit as well as explicit levels of awareness (Jost et al., 2002; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002; Rudman et al., 2002; Uhlmann et al., 2002).”
The social psychology of stigma. (2005, background): “For example, overweight women self-report lower personal self-esteem than do average-weight women (Miller & Downey 1999) and show lower collective self-esteem on implicit measures (Rudman et al. 2002).”
The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, unknown): “…can be characterized broadly as ‘‘If group X is culturally valued (or possesses a great deal of symbolic and/or material resources), it is good,’’ and it corroborates predictions of system justiﬁcation theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994; Jost et al., 2004; Rudman et al., 2002; Uhlmann et al., 2002).”
Sources of Implicit Attitudes (2004, background): “Finally, high-status groups (e.g., Whites, Christians, slim people, rich people) routinely show stronger implicit in-group bias than do low-status groups, but again, this is a function of their relative status (whereas explicit in-group bias is not; Rudman et al., 2002).”
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. (2003, unknown): “That assumption is consistent with much research evidence (e.g., Asendorpf, Banse, & Mu ¨cke, 2002; Ashburn-Nardo, Voils, & Monteith, 2001; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Gawronski, 2002; Greenwald et al., 2002; Greenwald & Nosek, 2001; McConnell & Leibold, 2001; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002b; Rudman”