Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity

By Brian A. Nosek, A. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005

1,177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/146c5337d32ad44c7db720106fe27976cc8ec011

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Gender Stereotypes in the Family Context: Mothers, Fathers, and Siblings (2013, methodology): “To reduce possible order effects of the presentation of congruent and incongruent blocks, two precautionary measures were taken (Nosek et al. 2005): the number of practice trials on the fifth of the seven blocks of the standard IAT procedure was increased, and two versions of the IAT were constructe”
The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations (2010, methodology): “The specific IAT procedure followed recommendations of Nosek, Greenwald, and Banaji (2005), and data analysis used the D algorithm (Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003 ).”
Reliability and validity of the Single‐Target IAT (ST‐IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects (2008, neutral): “Based on previous research in the political domain we expected medium to strong implicit–explicit correlations (Nosek et al., 2005; cf. Karpinski, Steinman, & Hilton, 2005 and Hofmann, Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005).”
You Can’t Fix What You Don’t Look At (2017, positive): “Both types of participant also pair Black faces or stereotypically Black names with negative words much faster than when pairing White faces/names with negative results or than when pairing Black faces/names with positive words (Nosek et al., 2005).”
Experiments on the Automaticity of Political Beliefs and Attitudes (2006, background): “For a careful assessment of several methodological concerns associated with the IAT, see Nosek et al. (2005).”
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, methodology): “Also, in a Gay–Straight attitude IAT, changing just two stimulus items in the “Gay people” category from representations of gay women to gay men resulted in stronger pro-straight preferences in the latter compared to the former representation (Nosek et al., 2005).”
Developing the Research Basis for Controlling Bias in Hiring (2012, background): “Implicit bias—unconscious association of traits with members of a demographic group (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2005)—has been demonstrated and these associations shown to correlate with biased behavior (Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002).”
Affective Focus Increases the Concordance Between Implicit and Explicit Attitudes (2011, methodology): “…is, of course, critical to interpreting any effects that are elicited (e.g., Bluemke & Friese, 2006; Steffens & Plewe, 2001; for a review of this and other procedural issues pertaining to the use of IATs see also Lane, Banaji, Nosek, & Greenwald, 2007; Nosek et al., 2005; Nosek et al., 2007).”
Effects of Intravenous Ketamine on Explicit and Implicit Measures of Suicidality in Treatment-Resistant Depression (2009, methodology): “IATs were administered and scored in accordance with recommended procedures (19) and followed a design described previously (9) (Supplement 2).”