No Place for Nostalgia in Science: A Response to Arkes and Tetlock

By Mahzarin R. Banaji, Brian A. Nosek, A. Greenwald. 2004

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8dde28dcdcbeed1fbb332a13f099879a38dba97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice (2009, background): “But some researchers see Allport’s definition as an overly restrictive definition of prejudice in an age when overt racial antipathy may be difficult to assess (Banaji et al. 2004).”
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007, unknown): “potential to shape behaviour, but not endorsed in that individuals could honestly disagree with their implicit reactions and even actively resist their influence ( Banaji, Nosek, & Greenwald, 2004 ).”
Lay Theories About White Racists: What Constitutes Racism (and What Doesn't) (2006, background): “Debate over the measurement and nature of racial bias (see Banaji, Nosek, & Green, 2004; Biernat & Crandall, 1999; Karpinski & Hilton, 2001) further illustrates the complexities surrounding attempts to study racism.”
A History of Implicit Social Cognition Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? (2010, background): “A thornier aspect of this debate is whether people who show negative automatic associations with ethnic groups should be considered prejudiced (Arkes & Tetlock, 2004; Banaji, Nosek, & Greenwald, 2004).”
The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation (2008, background): “…Arkes & Tetlock, 2004; Gehring et al., 2003; Karpinski & Hilton, 2001; Olson & Fazio, 2004), or a meaningful component of the implicit attitude construct distinguishing it from explicit evaluation (e.g., Banaji, 2001; Banaji et al., 2004; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002b) might appear to be moot.”