Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums
By M. Christopher, Julie A. Thomas, Mary K. Tallent-Runnels. 2004
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b919ab428cb23cca3122a252ca09579e671f7eb0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Anthony R. Artino Jr.
- Jason M. Stephens
- Beryl C. McEwen
- Jorge Gaytan
- William Y. Lan
- Moon-Heum Cho
- Marcia D Dixson
- Päivi Kousa
In Education
- Anthony R. Artino Jr.
- Jason M. Stephens
- Beryl C. McEwen
- Jorge Gaytan
- William Y. Lan
- Marcia D Dixson
- Moon-Heum Cho
- Emtinan Alqurashi
Citations in the corpus
- Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research (2006, background): “Cooper (1999) provided online resources and course materials in folders for each week of the course.”
- Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online (2009, methodology): “That said, Christopher et al. (2004) found that higher level discussion prompts (i.e., prompts that modeled a high level of critical thinking) had no effect on the level of graduate students' responses, as coded using a rubric developed from Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning.”
- Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies (2007, methodology): “The use of rubrics in effective assessments is supported by Christopher, Thomas, and Tallent-Runnels (2004 ) and MacKinnon (2002 ), who argued that rubrics must be carefully prepared to assess learning and promote critical thinking.”