LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF FACTORS THAT MEDIATE OR MODERATE THE RELATIONSHIP
By Leif Denti, Sven Hemlin. 2012
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b89bc8742b9e2dfae57214ee6b90f92af1755a51
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden (2022, background): “There is convincing evidence from outside the healthcare field of the importance of leadership for organizational culture and performance [32], the implementation of planned organizational change [33], and the implementation and stimulation of organizational innovation [34].”
- Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment (2020, background): “In particular, we know little about the contextual boundary factors that influence leaders’ abilities to promote innovation in organizations (Denti and Hemlin, 2012; Rosing et al., 2011), or about the psychological mechanisms that moderate the relationship between leadership and individual…”
- Entrepreneurial leadership of CEOs and employees’ innovative behavior in high-technology new ventures (2020, background): “Creative self-efficacy has also been suggested as a mediator of the relationship between leadership and employees’ innovative behavior in reviews of the leadership and innovation literature (Denti & Hemlin, 2012; Hughes et al., 2018).”
- Drawbacks of Artificial Intelligence and Their Potential Solutions in the Healthcare Sector (2023, background): “Even though the show’s creators insist the program is top-notch, the pool of participants they utilized to gauge effectiveness was over 77% male and 83% white [23–25”