Cultures and Organizations - Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival (3. ed.)

By G. Hofstede, Michael Minkov. 2010

2,143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b69e8c651e612d29c0e0db3fee71a3704e7022e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Drivers of local food consumption: A comparative study (2015, background): “These countries were chosen because they are both important food producers in their regions, but culturally different (Hofstede et al., 2010).”
The Effects of Values, Work Centrality, and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs (2013, background): “Since Turkish culture is characterized by relatively high collectivism and high power distance (Hofstede et al., 2010), among other factors, our OC measurements may have been susceptible to a spillover effect.”
Factors contributing to the quality of the transition out of elite sports in Swiss, Danish, and Polish athletes (2017, unknown): “The culture within Scandinavian countries influenced by the egalitarian welfare-state thinking could be a reason for the rather modest attitude towards their skills and the perceived lack of popularity of Danish athletes (Bairner, 2010), whereas a strong power distance (Hofstede et al., 2010) and a ”
Teacher–student interpersonal relationships in Indonesia: profiles and importance to student motivation (2011, background): “Indonesian society is characterized by a very high power distance index, indicating a high level of inequality of power and wealth within the society as well as high uncertainty avoidance index, illustrating a low level of tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity (Hofstede, 1991 ).”
Social Media Use and Impact during the Holiday Travel Planning Process (2012, background): “Based on Hofstede et al. (2010) Australians and Russians differ significantly in all four cultural dimensions: in power distance (Russia: 93, Australia: 36); in individualism (Russia: 39, Australia 90); in uncertainty avoidance (Russia: 95, Australia: 51); and in masculinity (Russia: 36, Australia:…”
RETRACTED: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors (2010, background): “It has been suggested that power distance is particularly important for leaders (Dorfman, 2004) because it describes not only how authority is perceived, but also how decision-making authority functions and affects ones’ thinking about organizations (Hofstede & Hofstede, 2005).”
An international perspective on classroom management: what should prospective teachers learn? (2011, background): “Looking at the Hofstede ( 1997 ) measures of cultural values, it seems that off‐task behavior is associated with lower power distance and higher individualism values in a country.”