By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams

By Aparna Joshi. 2014

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b664edb3f957be351f7138cef249309037f5c8a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Andrew P. Knight
2. David R. Hekman
3. Maw-Der Foo
4. Stefanie K Johnson
5. Wei Yang
6. Aparna Joshi
7. D. van Knippenberg

In Safety Research

1. Andrew P. Knight
2. David R. Hekman
3. Stefanie K Johnson
4. Aparna Joshi
5. Maw-Der Foo

In Social Psychology

1. Andrew P. Knight
2. David R. Hekman
3. Stefanie K Johnson
4. Maw-Der Foo
5. Wei Yang
6. Aparna Joshi
7. Eugene Yu Jin Tee
8. Jin Nam Choi

Citations in the corpus

• Who Defers to Whom and Why? Dual Pathways Linking Demographic Differences and Dyadic Deference to Team Effectiveness (2015, background): “Yet, there remains relatively little empirical research that adopts a dyad-level perspective in explaining team dynamics (see Joshi, 2014, and Van der Vegt, Bunderson, & Oosterhof, 2006, for exceptions).”
• Does Diversity-Valuing Behavior Result in Diminished Performance Ratings for Non-White and Female Leaders? (2017, background): “, 2004; Derks, Ellemers, van Laar, & de Groot, 2011) because advancing highstatus group members is thought to provide lowstatus group members with a psychic reward in terms of a sense of belonging among the White male demographic elite (Bettencourt, Charlton, Dorr, & Hume, 2001; Chattopadhyay et al.”