Adolescent Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement Trajectories in School and Their Differential Relations to Educational Success.

657 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement (2018, background): “Behavioral engagement refers to participation in learning activities, emotional engagement describes affective attitudes toward learning and school, and cognitive engagement refers to a self-regulated approach to learning and the use of metacognitive strategies (M. Wang & Eccles, 2011).”
Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning (2019, positive): “The engagement and disengagement continua come from robust theoretical and empirical work on the nature of how students act and interact in their classrooms (H. ; Skinner et al., 2009; Wang & Eccles, 2011).”
Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021, background): “Teacher support is one of the most important factors, as teachers play a crucial role in fostering student motivation in schools (Allen et al., 2013; Roorda et al., 2011; Wang & Eccles, 2012).”
Parent involvement and academic outcomes among urban adolescents: examining the role of school engagement (2016, background): “With some important exceptions (Dotterer, McHale, & Crouter, 2009; Wang & Eccles, 2012a) most empirical investigations have measured school engagement as a unidimensional construct or included just one or two indicators of school engagement.”