CULTURE‐BASED EXPECTATIONS OF CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP: A PROPOSITIONAL FRAMEWORK AND COMPARISON OF FOUR CULTURES

By Jeffrey P. Katz, D. Swanson, Lorissa K. Nelson. 2001

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Chinese Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (2009, methodology): “The questionnaire relied heavily on the one developed by Maignan (2001) so that comparisons could be undertaken.”
Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico (2010, unknown): “For instance, we do not consider societal pressures in our study, in light of the low level of consumer advocacy in Mexico (Katz et al., 2001).”
Corporate Philanthropic Giving, Advertising Intensity, and Industry Competition Level (2010, background): “Previous research (e.g., Chapple and Moon, 2005; Katz et al., 2001; Kolk, 2005; Muller and Whiteman, 2009; Shen, 2004; Welford, 2005) suggests that companies worldwide react and respond differently to natural disasters, and their philanthropic donations can be motivated by a variety of factors,…”
How the Perceptions of Five Dimensions of Corporate Citizenship and Their Inter-Inconsistencies Predict Affective Commitment (2010, background): “The second explanation is that perceptions of CC may be shaped by the socio-cultural context (Katz et al., 2001; Kim and Kim, 2009; Maignan, 2001).”