Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons
By John E. Mathieu, T. Heffner, G. Goodwin, J. Cannon-Bowers, Eduardo Salas. 2005
414 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b393df2b8cc8aace6fe190663b867a9401358efb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Susan Mohammed
- D. van Knippenberg
- Lori A. Ferzandi
- Katherine Hamilton
- John E. Mathieu
- M. Maynard
- Paul A. Kirschner
- Lucy L. Gilson
In Social Psychology
- D. van Knippenberg
- John E. Mathieu
- Susan Mohammed
- M. Maynard
- M. Schippers
- Katherine Hamilton
- Lori A. Ferzandi
- Tammy L. Rapp
Citations in the corpus
- Interactive Effects of Team and Task Shared Mental Models as Related to Air Traffic Controllers' Collective Efficacy and Effectiveness (2009, background): “…both types of SMMs and team processes or effectiveness (e.g., Edwards, Day, Arthur, & Bell, 2006; Lim & Klein, 2006; Marks et al., 2002, Sample 1; Mathieu et al., 2005; Mathieu et al., 2000; Smith-Jentsch et al., 2005; Stout, Cannon-Bowers, Salas, & Milanovich, 1999) as well as a link between…”
- Work group diversity. (2007, background): “…in their understanding of the team and the task (Mohammed & Ringseis 2001; also see Colquitt et al. 2002, Klein et al. level of sharedness may affect group performance (Mathieu et al. 2005), diversity in such team-and task-relevant cognitions deserves a place on the agenda of diversity research.”
- Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance (2011, background): “Research in shared task representations/mental models shows that such differences in task approach may impair communication between group members (e.g., Marks et al., 2000; Mathieu et al., 2005).”
- Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct (2010, methodology): “In contrast to TMM similarity findings, hypothesized linear effects of TMM accuracy and team processes have generally not been supported (e.g., Marks et al., 2000; Mathieu et al., 2005).”
- Differentiating knowledge in teams: The effect of shared declarative and procedural knowledge on team performance (2007, methodology): “This pattern of mixed findings has been found in some previous studies, e.g. Mathieu et al. (2000), which this study sought to replicate most closely, and also Mathieu et al. (2005).”
- Team learning: building shared mental models (2011, methodology): “This study was replicated in a more recent laboratory study of Mathieu et al. (2005), showing that task-work mental model similarity was significantly related to team performance.”
- Guided Team Self-Correction (2008, background): “This was the approach taken by Mathieu et al. (2005), who found that teammates holding dissimilar high-quality mental models of teamwork actually demonstrated the poorest teamwork processes.”
- Team Composition, Cognition, and Effectiveness: Examining Mental Model Similarity and Accuracy (2010, methodology): “This rating scale was adapted from Mathieu et al. (2000). The items contained in the mental model questionnaire are contained in Appendix B.”
- Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams (2008, methodology): “Shared mental models enable high-performing teams to coordinate their efforts without a need to communicate overtly (Lim and Klein 2006, Edwards et al. 2006, Mathieu et al. 2005, Mathieu et al. 2000, Cannon-Bowers et al. 1993).”
- How Influential Are Mental Models on Interaction Performance? Exploring the Gap between Users' and Designers' Mental Models through a New Quantitative Method (2017, background): “[39] found that team performance was partially mediated by teammates’ mental models.”
- Improved human–robot team performance through cross-training, an approach inspired by human team training practices (2015, background): “Mental model similarity is particularly important under conditions in which communication is difficult due to excessive workload, time pressure or another environmental feature, as teams are unable to engage in necessary strategizing under these circumstances (Mathieu et al., 2005).”