Structure and freedom in creativity: The interplay between externally imposed structure and personal cognitive style

By Lilach Sagiv, Sharon Arieli, Jacob Goldenberg, A. Goldschmidt. 2010

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b301e03749a2c92bfa61f0d50dae59debbbb66f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. I. Hoever
2. Jin Nam Choi
3. Jing Zhou
4. S. Sung
5. Christina E. Shalley
6. Markus Baer
7. Greg R. Oldham
8. Yaping Gong

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Jing Zhou
2. I. Hoever
3. Christina E. Shalley
4. Terri R. Kurtzberg

In Social Psychology

1. I. Hoever
2. Jing Zhou
3. Jin Nam Choi
4. S. Sung
5. Christina E. Shalley
6. Tae-Yeol Kim
7. Markus Baer
8. Greg R. Oldham

Citations in the corpus

• Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection (2014, background): “…personality attributes (e.g., the Big Five personality factors, Raja & Johns 2010; low creative personality, Zhou 2003), cognitive styles (e.g., Sagiv et al. 2010), prevention focus (Sacramento et al. 2013), values (e.g., conformity value; 345www.annualreviews.org Research on Workplace…”
• Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams (2012, background): “In contrast, a systematic cognitive style is a tendency to analyze a situation based on logic and intention (Sagiv et al., 2010).”