Developing preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of slope
By S. Stump. 2001
71 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2ee4893286ed94fafd4797e08442a1db166cf49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Pre-Service Mathematic Teachers’ Knowledge of Students about the Algebraic Concepts (2013, background): “The literature presents several studies about inservice teachers’ and preservice teachers’ knowledge of students in various subject areas (Carpenter, Fennema, Peterson & Carey, 1988; Even, 1993; Stump, 2001; An, Kulm & Wu, 2004; Son, 2006; Chick, Baker, Pham & Cheng, 2006; Baker & Chick, 2006; Bayaz”
- Secondary mathematics teachers’ meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change (2017, methodology): “…rate of change, and quotient typically focused on small numbers of teachers in an effort to model their meanings or to characterize their proficiency with these ideas (Ball, 1990; Coe, 2007; Fisher, 1988; McDiarmid & Wilson, 1991; Stump, 1999, 2001; Thompson, 1994b; Thompson & Thompson, 1994).”
- Playing Mathematical Instruments: Emerging Perceptuomotor Integration with an Interactive Mathematics Exhibit (2013, unknown): “…the concepts of rate of change and slope (Confrey & Smith, 1994; Lehrer, Strom, & Confrey, 2002; Lobato & Ellis, 2010; Lobato, Ellis, & Munoz, 2003; Lobato, Rhodehamel, & Hohensee, Under review; Lobato & Thanheiser, 2002; Saldanha & Thompson, 1998; Simon & Blume, 1994; Stump, 2002; Thompson, 1995).”
- Teachers’ Knowledge and the Teaching of Algebra (2004, background): “In a later study‚ which also examined the lessons taught by three pre-service teachers to college algebra students‚ Stump (2001) found that while “their knowledge of representations for teaching slope was dominated by graphs and physical situations” (p. 224)‚ the teachers’ actual lessons were focu”