COMMUNICATING WITH THE SEXES: Male and Female Responses to Print Advertisements
By S. Putrevu. 2004
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0a4b8b8c85b835865bef11137defc3e0e7af8c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Joan Meyers-Levy
- Nathalie Dens
- Amanda J. Broderick
- Martin Eisend
- B. Loken
- Stéphanie Feiereisen
- Patrick De Pelsmacker
- S. Douglas
In Gender Studies
- Patrick De Pelsmacker
- Nathalie Dens
- Sarah De Meulenaer
- Joan Meyers-Levy
- Amanda J. Broderick
- Martin Eisend
- B. Loken
- Stéphanie Feiereisen
In Marketing
- Patrick De Pelsmacker
- Nathalie Dens
- Sarah De Meulenaer
- Joan Meyers-Levy
- Amanda J. Broderick
- Martin Eisend
- B. Loken
- Stéphanie Feiereisen
Citations in the corpus
- How consumers' values influence responses to male and female gender role stereotyping in advertising (2018, background): “Putrevu (2004) concluded that men and women are likely to respond more favourably to messages that are in tune with their respective gender role expectations.”
- The Gender Gap (2014, unknown): “One marketing study noted superior attitudes toward verbal advertisements by females and more favorable attitudes toward simple, attribute-oriented advertisements by males, attributed to unique thoughts and processing styles for each gender (Putrevu, 2004).”
- The Effect and Moderation of Gender Identity Congruity: Utilizing 'Real Women' Advertising Images (2009, methodology): “Biological gender has been extensively utilized in segmentation studies (Dommeyer, 2008; Huhmann & Mott-Stenerson, 2008; Putrevu, 2008; Barone, Palan, & Miniward, 2004; Brunel & Nelson, 2003; Meyers-Levy & Sternthal, 1991), as this criterion meets several of the requirements for successful implement”
- Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead☆ (2015, background): “For example, based on speculation that males (females) engage in greater itemspecific (relational) elaboration, Putrevu (2004) found that males (females) responded more favorably to ads that were simple (complex), focused on attributes (the product category), and included relatively antagonistic…”