Energizing Learning: The Instructional Power of Conflict
By David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson. 2009
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b05f5eb58cb764dd0579a98c3dfb912e510f6dc1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- David W. Johnson
- Roger T. Johnson
- Rina Hershkowitz
- R. Beach
- Baruch B. Schwarz
- Ming-Te Wang
- Jamie D. Smith
- Naomi Prusak
In Social Psychology
- David W. Johnson
- Roger T. Johnson
- Maureen E. Brinkworth
- Ming-Te Wang
- Hunter Gehlbach
- Robyn M. Gillies
- Van-Dat Tran
- Ramon Lewis
In Sociology and Political Science
- David W. Johnson
- Roger T. Johnson
- Ming-Te Wang
- Maureen E. Brinkworth
- Baruch B. Schwarz
- Hunter Gehlbach
- David M. Quinn
- Van-Dat Tran
Citations in the corpus
- Cooperative learning in 21st century (2014, background): “Cooperation will, however, play a vital role in building positive relationships in each setting, whereas competition and individualism will tend to result in negative relationships in each setting (Johnson & Johnson, 1989, 2005, 2009a).”
- The Social Perspective Taking Process: What Motivates Individuals to Take Another's Perspective? (2012, background): “For example, “constructive controversies” (Johnson & Johnson, 2009) have a robust reputation as a fruitful way of motivating students to engage in SPT.”
- From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design (2012, background): “37) Johnsson and Johnsson (2009) mention two types of conflict that are important for learning/teaching and as such are crucial in our design research as well: (1) Conceptual conflicts, when information being received does not seem consistent with”
- Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research (2011, background): “…to acquiring academic literacies, they are often leery of introducing what may evolve into conflict and one-upmanship employed in the media, that is, argument consisting of competitive, combative debate (Johnson & Johnson, 2009) that leads to an “adversarial frame of mind” (Tannen, 1999, p. 4).”