Variation in the effectiveness of instructional interactions across preschool classroom settings and learning activities

By Sonia Q. Cabell, Jamie DeCoster, Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch, B. Hamre, Robert C. Pianta. 2013

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0020bab8087b3ae103c613987c4b02cb2bffa09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Early Childhood Educators’ Self-Efficacy in Science, Math, and Literacy Instruction and Science Practice in the Classroom (2018, background): “, book reading or literacy/math instruction), teachers tend to engage in the highest quality teacher–child interactions when they engage in science (Cabell et al., 2013); these high-quality interactions include supports for concept development, expansion of child ideas, and use of open-ended questio”
Using the Scientific Method to Guide Learning: An Integrated Approach to Early Childhood Curriculum (2013, background): “In fact, recent research has identified that teachers are more likely to use highquality language (e.g., asking open-ended questions) during science activities than during any other classroom contexts (e.g., dramatic play, math center) (Cabell et al. 2012).”
Does professional development reduce the influence of teacher stress on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms?☆ (2018, background): “A number of covariates were included either because they were determined to be conceptually important in this sample or because they had appeared in prior studies of teacher–child interactions (Cabell et al., 2013; Hamre et al., 2012; Mashburn et al., 2008; Pianta, Mashburn et al., 2008).”
Teacher–Child Interactions in Free Choice and Teacher-Directed Activity Settings: Prediction to School Readiness (2017, background): “Covariates A number of covariates were included because we felt they were conceptually important in this sample or because they had appeared in prior studies of teacher–child interactions (Cabell et al., 2013; Hamre et al., 2012; Mashburn et al., 2008; Pianta, Mashburn, Downer, Hamre, & Justice, 200”