A Study of Class Size Effects in English School Reception Year Classes
By P. Blatchford, Harvey Goldstein, Clare Martin, William J. Browne. 2002
104 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afda54d4c0cf3f0cd3252ba3762e15a2cebbb4e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- P. Brown
- P. Bassett
- P. Blatchford
- A. Russell
- Clare Martin
- James R. Carpenter
- Hans Luyten
- Michael G. Kenward
Citations in the corpus
- Efficient Quantile Regression Analysis With Missing Observations (2015, methodology): “A REAL DATA EXAMPLE In this section, we illustrate the proposed method using a subset of the data given in Carpenter and Kenward (2005), extracted from Blatchford et al. (2002).”
- The role and effects of teaching assistants in English primary schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000–2003. Results from the Class Size and Pupil–Adult Ratios (CSPAR) KS2 Project (2004, background): “A recent systematic review (Howes, Farrell, Kaplan and Moss, 2003) identified the CSPAR KS1 study (Blatchford et al, 2002) as one of only a very few studies of sufficiently high quality to warrant inclusion.”
- An empirical assessment of the absolute effect of schooling: regression‐discontinuity applied to TIMSS‐95 (2006, background): “Being the youngest or oldest in a class may have an effect on achievement per se (Blatchford et al., 2002).”
- A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data (2006, methodology): “Further details, and the initial findings, were described in Blatchford et al. (2002).”