Can team members share leadership?: Foundations in research and theory
By A. Seers, Tiffany Keller, J. Wilkerson. 2003
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af87e22f1f709a53da5de576fcd86f21dc4a45cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Michelle C. Bligh
- C. Pearce
- Jeffrey C. Kohles
- Cynthia D. Mccauley
- Charles J. Palus
- Bonnie S. O’Neill
- Monica P. Adya
- Kyle Lewis
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- The importance of self‐ and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso‐level model of leadership dynamics (2006, background): “In addition, multilevel theory development is an important and necessary next step in order to “connect the dots” in the organizational literature, making explicit the links between constructs that have not been previously linked (Klein et al., 1999, p. 248).”
- Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership (2008, background): “…well beyond the limits of the ontology of the tripod, and we believe the DAC ontologywill provide support for the further development of such theory (e.g., Ensley, Hmielski, & Pearce, 2006; Ernst & Yip, in press; Klein, Ziegert, Knight & Xiao, 2006; Pearce & Conger, 2003; Seers et al., 2003).”
- Alternative Approaches for Studying Shared and Distributed Leadership (2011, unknown): “In contrast to this, in an effort to highlight the theoretical reasons why patterns of reciprocal influence should emerge and be sustained across group members in self managed teams Seers et al (2003) developed a model which does not include formal leaders.”