Justice as a Rationale for the Controllability Principle: A Study of Managers' Opinions
By F. Giraud, Pascal Langevin, Carla Mendoza. 2008
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af147087080978ded23d3d7c1a6d9e72279f1bad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Michael Burkert
- Jeni Didham
- C. Stringer
- Utz Schäffer
- Matthew Hall
- Paul Theivananthampillai
- Franziska Fischer
- J. Bisbe
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Michael Burkert
- Jeni Didham
- C. Stringer
- Utz Schäffer
- Matthew Hall
- Paul Theivananthampillai
- Franziska Fischer
- J. Bisbe
Citations in the corpus
- Motivation, pay satisfaction, and job satisfaction of front‐line employees (2011, methodology): “The use of correlation analysis for hypothesis testing has held to be sufficient in prior papers (Merchant, 1990; Giraud et al., 2008).”
- Realising the richness of psychology theory in contingency-based management accounting research (2016, background): “For example, Giraud et al. (2008) draw on justice theory to propose that the presence of uncontrollable items in a manager’s performance assessment generates perceptions the evaluation process is unfair as it violates principles of equity.”
- Application of the Controllability Principle and Managerial Performance: The Role of Role Perceptions (2011, background): “A related stream of literature highlights the motivational effects of managerial perceptions of fairness that arise from applying the controllability principle (Giraud et al., 2008; Huffman and Cain, 2001).”