Bilingual Visual Word Recognition and Lexical Access.

By A. Dijkstra. 2005

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adcd1b3cd4bdbf86a02e9c821ca5a330a119805c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

WHEN GENDER AND LOOKING GO HAND IN HAND (2013, background): “Second, because current models of L2 processing demonstrate that processing is infl uenced by the native language system (Dijkstra, 2005 ; Kroll & Stewart, 1994 ), we also examine whether the presence of a gender system in the L1 that overlaps signifi cantly with the gender system of the L2…”
A UNIFIED MODEL (2007, background): “Dijkstra (2005) notes that, in laboratory settings, the suppression of these incorrect forms is incomplete, even in highly proficient bilinguals.”
FIRST LANGUAGE ACTIVATION DURING SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL PROCESSING: An Investigation of Lexical Form, Meaning, and Grammatical Class (2006, background): “4+33, p , +05+ Although the BIA model predicts that form-related relatives are active in both languages during word recognition for proficient bilinguals, this result shows form-based interference for both proficiency levels, which not only supports the claim of the BIA model but also extends the re”
Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue (2006, background): “And they do so always as a function of time (MacWhinney 1998), time on all scales: in thousands of years—the recency of the diachronic divergence of the L2 and L3 in the evolution of languages, in years—the age of the learners and their length of exposure to the language, in milliseconds—the particu”
Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, background): “On this view, selectivity and seriality in production are seen as possible default options under rather special conditions (see Dijkstra, 2005, for a similar claim about word recognition).”
AN EYE FOR WORDS (2013, unknown): “First, we excluded words with Dutch cognates as well as words with English or Dutch pseudohomophones 6 because the similarity of such stimuli with existing Dutch or English words might cause readers to process them faster or acquire them more easily (Dijkstra, 2005 ).”
Juggling Two Languages in One Mind (2008, background): “Studies of bilingual word recognition have asked whether words or lexical features associated with the language not in use are activated when recognizing a word in one language alone out of context (e.g., Dijkstra, 2005; Kroll et al., 2006).”
Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging (2014, unknown): “…activation and inhibition during language production and comprehension (Blumenfeld & Marian, 2011; Christoffels, Firk, & Schiller, 2007; Dijkstra, 2005; Green, 2011; Guo, Liu, Misra, & Kroll, 2011; Kroll et al., 2008; Macizo, Bajo, & Martin, 2010; Martin, Macizo, & Bajo, 2010; Misra,…”
The representation and processing of identical cognates by late bilinguals: RT and ERP effects (2013, background): “At the same time, a high French frequency would also increase the error rates for these words, because participants could link French language status to a no-response in the English lexical decision task (cf. Dijkstra, 2005).”
Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. (2008, methodology): “Various models have addressed this problem using some aspect of inhibitory control as the mechanism, in either a cognitive attention system (D. W. Green, 1998) or connectionist architecture (Dijkstra, 2005).”
How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition (2010, methodology): “The cognate facilitation effect and task demands Just like interlingual homograph effects (Dijkstra, van Jaarsveld, & ten Brinke, 1998; Dijkstra, Timmermans, & Schriefers, 2000; Dijkstra, 2005), cognate effects might be task dependent.”
Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent* (2009, background): “This view is based on bilingual speech production modeling in which these retrieval effects are simulated in a connectionist network (Dijkstra, 2005).”
Language switching and language competition (2012, background): “…bilingualism, language inhibition I Introduction Several studies have demonstrated that bilinguals activate both of their languages when they are performing a given task (non-selective processing; for reviews, see Macizo et al., 2010; Martín et al., 2010; see also Dijkstra, 2005; Kroll, 2006).”
Dual mechanisms of cognitive control in bilinguals and monolinguals (2013, background): “…studies have shown that bilinguals activate their 2 languages even in situations where they are required to use only 1 (Blumenfeld & Marian, 2007; Colomé, 2001; Dijkstra, 2005; Hoshino & Thierry, 2011; Ju & Luce, 2004; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Macizo, Bajo, & Martı́n, 2010; Spivey & Marian, 1999).”