Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire ☆

By Katherine A. Lawrence, Peter J. Lenk, Ryan W. Quinn. 2009

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Paradoxical Leadership and the Competing Values Framework (2014, background): “This premise has garnered empirical support (Dennison, Hooijberg, & Quinn, 1995; K. A. Lawrence et al., 2009; Spreitzer & Quinn, 1996).”
Health-specific leadership: Is there an association between leader consideration for the health of employees and their strain and well-being? (2011, background): “Yet explanatory models such as the framework of competing values incorporate these multiple demands and show that leaders are able to manage this complexity and these seemingly contradictory demands (Lawrence et al., 2009).”
The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance (2017, background): “…there are already robust measurements of character (e.g. the VIA Inventory of Strengths, based on Peterson's and Seligman's work, and the LCIA-Leader Character Insight Assessment, based on Crossan et al., in press) and competence (e.g., Lawrence et al., 2009; Quinn et al., 2015) that are available.”