Measuring workplace bullying

By H. Cowie, P. Naylor, I. Rivers, Pete Smith, B. Pereira. 2002

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac3ad7c232535221c395d463b03ef95a85f341b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond (2005, methodology): “…either to cite one or both of these studies as evidence of the reliability of the CIT research method (Proulx, 1991; Young, 1991), or not to refer to the reliability or validity of the method at all (Cowie et al., 2002; Gould, 1999; Parker, 1995; Schmelzer et al., 1987; Thousand et al., 1986).”
Self and peer nominations of bullying: An analysis of incident rates, individual differences, and perceptions of the working environment (2003, background): “Another criticism of the research is the lack of verification (such as peer nominations) of bullying incidences (Cowie et al., 2002; Einarsen, 2000).”
Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree and Impact† (2007, neutral): “…have identified bully targets by: (a) counting the occurrence of various negative acts over a specified period of time using a behavioural checklist; and (b) participants’ self-identification as a target (for an in-depth discussion of workplace bullying measurement issues, see Cowie et al., 2002).”
The Effects of Ethical Climates on Bullying Behaviour in the Workplace (2009, background): “On the other hand, the prevailing ethical climate type within an organization determines employees’ decisions about what is right or wrong, and has an influence on employee behaviour (Cowie et al., 2002).”
Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets' and perpetrators' experiences of workplace bullying (2009, result): ““being excluded from group activities by colleagues”), in line with Cowie's (Cowie et al, 2002 ) categorization of possible workplace bullying behaviour.”
Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study (2007, result): “Moreover, previous studies are also difficult to compare due to differences in the research designs, measures, and statistical analyses employed (for a discussion on the measurement of bullying see Cowie, Naylor, Rivers, Smith, & Pereira, 2002 ; Notelaers, Einarsen, De Witte, & Vermunt, 2006 ).”