Longitudinal Relations Between 2-Year-Olds' Language and 4-Year-Olds' Theory of Mind

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. (2007, unknown): “(Contd) Study N Language ability measure Type of false-belief task r/mean r Ruffman, Perner, and Parkin (1999) 64 British Picture Vocabulary Scale Change-of-location .00 Ruffman, Slade, Clements, and Import (1998)FStudy 2 64 Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Preschool (Linguistic Concep”
Theory of Mind: a Hidden Factor in Reading Comprehension? (2018, background): “Relatedly, individual differences in ToM are predicted by language (Jenkins and Astington 1996; Lillard and Kavanaugh 2012; Milligan et al. 2007; Watson et al. 2001) and executive function skills (Henning, Spinath, & Aschersleben 2010; Hughes & Ensor 2005; Hughes 1998), both of which are also…”
How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory and false belief (2005, background): “Watson, Painter, and Bornstein (2001) and Farrar and Maag (2002) showed that toddlers’ language ability at 2 years predicted false belief at 4 years of age.”