Field Experiments in Organizations

By D. Eden. 2017

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab7df3e267f42ff99f3f97922b921cb2857b500f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Christian Zehnder
2. Bernardo F. Quiroga
3. Sirio Lonati
4. John Antonakis
5. Jens Rowold
6. Philippe Jacquart
7. Heike Bruch
8. R. House

In Social Psychology

1. Christian Zehnder
2. John Antonakis
3. P. D. Harms
4. Neal M. Ashkanasy
5. Marcus Crede
6. Philippe Jacquart
7. Deepika Dabke
8. Shih Yung Chou

In Strategy and Management

1. John Antonakis

Citations in the corpus

• On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017, background): “…also to see more field experiments in our journal; consequential and ecologically-valid settings are particularly welcome because such designs are the “gold standard” for causal, and externally valid, evidence (Chatterji, Findley, Jensen, Meier, & Nielson, 2016; Eden, 2017; Harrison & List, 2004).”
• On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, background): “…(i.e., age, gender, university major, etc. should be equally represented in the two conditions) or (b) including control variables in regression model, and hence show that the treatment effect is not directly driven by their inclusion or exclusion (for a brief overview, see Eden, 2017, p. 96).”