From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research
By Julian Birkinshaw, Mary Yoko Brannen, Rosalie L. Tung. 2011
620 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a80af1e66210aa2b9ae9270cd44fb3af7563b11d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Günter K. Stahl
- Markus Pudelko
- Rosalie L. Tung
- Helene Tenzer
- Anne-Wil Harzing
- B. Ackers
- N. Eccles
- Riikka M. Sarala
Citations in the corpus
- Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship (2014, background): “In fairness, JIBS has recognized the potential contributions of qualitative research and has devoted an entire Special Issue on that subject (Birkinshaw et al., 2011).”
- Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices (2015, background): “Exploratory studies frequently utilise qualitative research methods to understand the emerging phenomena and provide a rigorous approach to the development of theory (Birkinshaw et al., 2011).”
- The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams (2014, background): “…areas (Morgan & Smircich, 1980; Suddaby, 2006), as it brings us “closer to theoretical constructs” (Siggelkow, 2007: 22) than any other approach and allows us to gain an “up-close and grounded” (Birkinshaw et al., 2011: 575; Brannen et al., 2012: 3) understanding of the micro-processes under study.”