Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship

By Günter K. Stahl, Rosalie L. Tung. Journal of International Business Studies, 2014

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emerging economies and institutional quality: Assessing the differential effects of institutional distances on ownership strategy (2016, background): “…and acquired firms have been discussed as a double-edged sword that may serve as the source of innovation derived from differing world views as well as pose obstacles to overcoming the cultural barriers in postacquisition integration (Reus & Lamont, 2009; Stahl & Tung, 2015; Stahl & Voigt, 2008).”
Diverse effects of diversity: Disaggregating effects of diversity in global virtual teams (2019, background): “Indeed, a recent review revealed that almost 95% of the 1141 studies that investigated distance posited negative theoretical assumptions about its effects (Stahl and Tung, 2014).”
Widening the lens: Rethinking distance, diversity, and foreignness in international business research through positive organizational scholarship (2016, background): “…Business Studies over a 24-year time period revealed a 17:1 ratio in research that made negative theoretical assumptions over those that made positive ones, supporting the conclusion that there is an overwhelming emphasis on the liabilities associated with cultural distance (Stahl & Tung, 2014).”