Dualisms in Leadership Research

By Gail T. Fairhurst. 2001

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7506d534fa3bafd7407e52dfac3f88c861d50a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Dialectics of leadership (2005, background): “In his study of followers’ fantasies about leaders, Gabriel (1997) takes for granted that the latter retain a psychological grip on the former.”
A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange (2012, background): “In work contexts, perceived similarity on work issues, such as how to best accomplish tasks, as well as nonwork topics enhances communications that are critical for developing solid relationships (Fairhurst, 2001).”
Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? (2014, background): “…dialectical analysis can now be discerned in theories of society (Giddens, 1984; Bhaskar, 1993; Latour, 1993)8, organization (Bartunek, 2006; Norton, 2009; Putnam, 2003), communication (e.g. Barge et al., 2008; Tracy, 2004; Trethewey, 1999), and leadership (Collinson, 2005a, 2011; Fairhurst, 2001).”
The Social Construction of Leadership: A Sailing Guide (2010, background): “When leaders are the primary symbolizing agents, followers putatively surrender their right to make meanings by virtue of their employment contract with the organization (Fairhurst, 2001; Gronn, 2002; Smircich & Morgan, 1982).”
Living Leadership: A Systemic Constructionist Approach (2008, background): “…study of leadership communication has a long-standing history even though analysts have worried at various times about its peripheral status within the organizational sciences (Barge & Schleuter, 1991; Fairhurst, 2001; Goldhaber et al., 1978; Jablin, 1979; Mumby, 2007; Redding, 1972, 1985).”