Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: can one construct predict them all?

By N. Kuncel, Sarah A. Hezlett, Deniz S. Ones. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004

893 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6f29ab0b952fae68cb32de90ed3f106883ecbd7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized (2005, background): “Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that measured intellectual ability is more than simply aptitude for schooling (Kuncel et al., 2004).”
The Validity of the Graduate Record Examination for Master’s and Doctoral Programs: A Meta-Analytic Investigation (2010, methodology): “However, research indicates that standardized test scores predict learning and performance in situations that require the processing information or acquisition of new knowledge (for reviews, see Cattell, 1971; Kuncel et al., 2004), even when the outcomes are not grades in courses (Kuncel & Hezlett, ”
Sex differences in secondary school success: why female students perform better (2013, background): “(Gottfredson 2003; Kuncel et al. 2004; Sternberg et al. 2001).”
Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between the Big Five and Academic Success at University (2007, methodology): “European studies were included concerning the predictors school grades, intelligence, admission, and knowledge tests, because there are already meta-analyses for North American results (e.g., Burton & Ramist, 2001; Kuncel et al., 2001, 2004).”
Males have greater g: Sex differences in general mental ability from 100,000 17- to 18-year-olds on the Scholastic Assessment Test ☆ (2006, background): “More than any other factor, the magnitude of the test's g loading best determines a test's power to predict academic achievement, creativity, career potential, and job performance (Kuncel, Hezlett, & Ones, 2004; Lubinski, 2004).”