Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs

By Niels Noorderhaven, Anne-Wil Harzing. 2009

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a631b6b15d3317166e770ee8b342faddd8dd4b2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Markus Pudelko
2. Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
3. Mike W. Peng
4. Yi‐Ying Chang
5. Tomi Seppälä
6. Mika Gabrielsson
7. Peter Gabrielsson
8. Yaping Gong

In Strategy and Management

1. Markus Pudelko
2. Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
3. Peter Gabrielsson
4. Anne-Wil Harzing
5. Mike W. Peng
6. Mika Gabrielsson
7. Yi‐Ying Chang
8. Tomi Seppälä

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance (2012, background): “…international mail surveys (e.g., Dikova & van Witteloostuijn, 2007; Harzing & Noorderhaven, 2006; Noorderhaven & Harzing, 2009) and is not unusual for multi-country studies in which highlevel managers are the respondents (Harzing, 1997; Harzing & Noorderhaven, 2006; Noorderhaven & Harzing, 2009).”
• Nation branding and integrated marketing communications: an ASEAN perspective (2010, background): “In the context of multinational enterprises, Noorderhaven and Harzing (2009)”
• Why and how does shared language affect subsidiary knowledge inflows? A social identity perspective (2015, background): “…conceptualize subsidiary receipt of tacit knowledge as an act to construct a common identity with HQ. MNE knowledge flows may occur in multiple directions, vertically between the HQ and a subsidiary, and horizontally between different subsidiaries (Noorderhaven & Harzing, 2009; Yang et al., 2008).”
• Marketing Strategies for Foreign Expansion of Companies Originating in Small and Open Economies: The Consequences of Strategic Fit and Performance (2012, methodology): “…we used two statistical approaches to study the potential common method variance problem: Harman’s single factor test (Podsakoff and Organ 1986) and a marker variable method (Lindell and Whitney 2001), in line with some previous international business research (e.g., Noorderhaven and Harzing 2009).”
• Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance (2012, background): “Transfer of tacit knowledge, in particular, requires extensive interaction (Damanpour, Devece, Chen, & Pothukuchi, 2012; Noorderhaven & Harzing , 2009; Su, Li, Yang, & Li, 2011), the success of which depends on social relationships between the source and the recipient.”