An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on business performance
By Fang Wu, Vijay Mahajan, Sridhar Balasubramanian. 2003
649 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a62d7ed608c0f4dabade5ceab933330f08c0c446
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Ralitza Nikolaeva
- Adam Rapp
- Younghwa Lee
- Raj Agnihotri
- Kenneth A. Kozar
- Salma S. Abed
- Constanza Bianchi
- Shane Mathews
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Keith J. Perks
- Ralitza Nikolaeva
- Adam Rapp
- Kemal Kilic
- Younghwa Lee
- Gürhan Günday
- Raj Agnihotri
- Kenneth A. Kozar
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. M. Andzulis
- Ralitza Nikolaeva
- Adam Rapp
- Younghwa Lee
- Raj Agnihotri
- Kenneth A. Kozar
- Salma S. Abed
- Constanza Bianchi
Citations in the corpus
- Internet marketing capabilities and international market growth (2016, methodology): “Thus, given the lack of knowledge of the influence of Internet marketing resources and capabilities on a firm’s international market growth and the contribution this can make to overcome barriers to foreign market entry and expansion for SMEs, the central aim of our study is to answer the research q”
- Internet marketing and export market growth in Chile (2016, methodology): “Finally, adapting from Wu et al. (2003), a four-item scalemeasures business network relationships.”
- Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach (2006, background): “Keywords: Website quality; E-business success; Analytic hierarchy process”
- Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs (2020, methodology): “Six items were occupied from Lin and Lin (2008); Wu et al. (2003); Soliman and Janz (2004) and Grandon and Pearson (2004) to measure trading partner pressure.”
- Exploring CRM effectiveness: an institutional theory perspective (2011, background): “…2002; Homburg et al. 1999; Iyer 1997; Rao et al. 2008), with the exception of studies focusing on explaining adoption of marketing practices (e.g., Wu et al. 2003), our paper will apply it to the case of a marketing practice that has recently been popular: customer relationship management (CRM).”
- Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance (2011, positive): “A large number of studies focusing on the innovation-performance relationship provides a positive appraisal of higher innovativeness resulting in increased corporate performance (Damanpour and Evan, 1984; Damanpour et al., 1989; Deshpande et al., 1993; Dos Santos and Peffers, 1995; McGrath et al., 1”
- Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings (2015, neutral): “…MI O US S O-P E O β, r For-profit 300 MI O US MS O-P E O β, r Whittington et al. (1999) 458 MI O MUL MS P E O β Wu and Hsieh (2011) 196 MI O OC S P N P β, r Wu and Lin (2011) 406 MI, TI O OC MS P E-N P β, r Wu et al. (2003) 144 MI U US M P E, N P β, r Xie et al. (2007) 143 MI, TI O OC MS P…”
- Social media technology usage and customer relationship performance: A capabilities-based examination of social CRM (2014, methodology): “Another measurement approach for consideration is to employ a perceptual measure that not only captures the technologies used by the firm but also the usage intensity, or the extent to which the technologies are used within an organization (e.g., Wu et al., 2003).”
- The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards (2011, background): “Wu et al. (2003) discuss the role of institutional pressures in the case of e-business adoption by technology companies, noting that institutional pressures may explain innovation adoption beyond explanations offered by market orientation.”