The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards

By Ralitza Nikolaeva, M. Bicho. 2011

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d0334fc122f98d689564d44f17e6997932a61df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative (2015, unknown): “2009a-b; Levy et al., 2010; Nikolaeva & Bicho, 2011; Waddock, 2007).”
New Evidence on the Role of the Media in Corporate Social Responsibility (2016, unknown): “Nikolaeva and Bicho (2011) provide additional rationale for the need to control for corruption when studying the media/CSR relationship.”
The Role of Normative CSR‐Promoting Institutions in Stimulating CSR Disclosures in Developing Countries (2018, unknown): “As mentioned earlier, given that CSR disclosure is a multi-dimensional construct and consistent with the previous studies (Hackston & Milne, 1996; Haniffa & Cooke, 2005; Branco & Rodrigues, 2008; Reverte, 2009), these dimensions have been combined in order to obtain a composite measure.”
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review (2017, background): “…1992; Oh et al., 2011), investors (Wilmshurst & Frost, 2000), environ-mentalists (Deegan & Gordon, 1996; Neu et al., 1998) and the media (Neu et al., 1998; Deegan et al., 2002; Reverte, 2009; Nikolaeva & Bicho, 2011) in a given country were also found to in ﬂ uence CSR disclosure (Table 2).”
Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises (2017, background): “Indeed, good CSR performers have incentives to report their positive performance (Nikolaeva & Bicho, 2011), but poor CSR performers can also be active reporters because “[it] allows the firm to apologize, explain, justify, or blame others for its actions, thereby helping to maintain legitimacy”…”