Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative
By R. Owston, Dennis N. York, S. Murtha. Internet and Higher Education, 2013
448 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5cc7c881c5a627276ff30cb49a0bbb104718600
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Bram De Wever
- Ngoc Thuy Thi Thai
- Martin Valcke
- Michiel Voet
- Ruth Boelens
- Rosemary L. Fisher
- Áron Perényi
- N. Birdthistle
Citations in the corpus
- The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction (2018, background): “…the adoption by students of the technology that delivers blended learning, typically the Learning Management System (LMS), is variable (Henderson et al., 2017), and there is evidence that it is student achievement levels that influence satisfaction with blended learning (Owston et al., 2013).”
- The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best "blend" of lectures and guiding questions with feedback (2017, background): “3 on students’ perceptions and related academic achievement (Deperlioglu and Kose, 2013; LópezPérez, Pérez-López, and Rodríguez-Ariza, 2011; Owston et al., 2013; Suda, Sterling, Guirguis, and Mathur, 2014).”
- Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review (2017, background): “…several researchers have found that increased flexibility and learner control are especially beneficial for high achievers or students that possess self-regulation skills, while low achievers may not yet possess the required skills for independent learning (Owston et al., 2013; Tsai & Shen, 2009).”