The Impact of Respect Versus Neglect of Self-Identities on Identification and Group Loyalty

By Manuela Barreto, N. Ellemers. 2002

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a59fd61cde811b76636906387789ae4d0fc71cac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. S. Cartwright
2. Katherine M. White
3. Yuen J. Huo
4. N. Ellemers
5. Patricia L. Obst
6. Kevin R. Binning
7. Michelle K. Ryan
8. Floor Rink

In Sociology and Political Science

1. N. Ellemers
2. Katherine M. White
3. Michelle K. Ryan
4. Floor Rink
5. Yuen J. Huo
6. B. Derks
7. Patricia L. Obst
8. Kevin R. Binning

Citations in the corpus

• SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS (2006, background): “…in this section is that, aside from cognitive salience effects, expressions of identity and signs of identification may also stem from people’s attempts to actively negotiate their identity to fit their preferred self-views (Barreto & Ellemers, 2002, 2003; Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 2002).”
• Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this) (2012, background): “In sum, if the tendency of others to treat someone as a representative of a particular group (e.g., women) does not match the individual’s preferred self-views and subjective importance of that group, this is a source of threat (Barreto & Ellemers, 2002, 2003; Ellemers & Barreto, 2006a).”
• Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences (2008, background): “According to recent research (e.g. Barreto & Ellemers, 2002; Huo & Molina, 2006; O’Brien, Haslam, Jetten, & O’Sullivan, 2005), respect contributes positively to intergroup relations.”
• The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities (2003, unknown): “We argue that one important factor that may lead people to internalise membership in a group in which they have been categorised is whether they feel that their initial sense of identity remains valid (Barreto & Ellemers, 2002).”
• Choosing to belong: The influence of choice on social identification and psychological sense of community (2007, background): “Based on the findings of research examining choice in the social identity theory literature (Barreto & Ellemers, 2002; Ellemers et al., 1999; Finchilescu, 1986), it was expected that identification would increase as the degree of choice over membership in the group increased.”
• My Choice, Your Categories: The Denial of Multiracial Identities (2009, background): “Barreto and Ellemers (2002) examined the effects of miscategorization on individuals’ identification with two groups after test-based versus voluntary assignment to those groups.”
• The Interpretation of Multiracial Status and Its Relation to Social Engagement and Psychological Well‐Being (2009, background): “Research suggests that having one’s valued identities neglected or ignored can be a threatening experience (e.g., Barreto & Ellemers, 2002; Hornsey & Hogg, 2000; Huo & Molina, 2006; Huo, Molina, Sawahata, & Denag, 2005; see also Huo & Binning, 2008).”
• Is Pluralism a Viable Model of Diversity? The Benefits and Limits of Subgroup Respect (2006, background): “Barreto and Ellemers (2002) also point toward identity threat as an explanation by suggesting that individuals may resist being categorized into a group that is discrepant with their self-view.”