Trust and Trustworthiness

By R. Hardin. 2002

836 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a539d519d050ac8ba8be566a8dcacc9fff3bf4e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Emotional Expressivity and Trustworthiness: The Role of Nonverbal Behavior in the Evolution of Cooperation (2003, methodology): “There is little research on trustworthiness per se (Hardin, 2002).”
The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams (2014, background): “…is not only defined by the characteristics of the trustor and the trustee, but also the specific context in which their relationship is embedded (Hardin, 2002), scholars have been encouraged to enrich their models with additional variables, which are “unique to studying trust within a…”
To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking (2005, background): “Institutional rational choice scholars view these incentives as being shaped largely by the presence of rules governing the negotiation, monitoring, and enforcement of consensual agreements (Hardin 2002, 127; Rothstein 2000; Ruscio 1999; Williamson 1993).”
Why Teachers Trust School Leaders. (2013, neutral): “Adaptability is part of relationships and organizations that remain effective (Heifetz and Linsky, 2002, p. 14). Economists explain change in organizational behaviour as involving an initial shift from “optimal” to “sub-optimal” in order to incorporate the change. This explanation rests on the presu”
Social capital, institutions and trust (2007, positive): “According to Nooteboom (2002), trust should be taken as a four-place predicate: the trustor (1) trusts a trustee (2, cf. Hardin 2002) in on or more aspects of behaviour (3), under certain circumstances (4).”
What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything? (2008, background): “One of the theoretically most developed examples of a rational concept of trust is “encapsulated interest” (Hardin 2001, 2002, 2006): “[F]or us to trust you we must believe your motivations toward us are to serve our interests, broadly conceived, with respect to the issues at stake” (Hardin 2006,…”
Trust, Distrust and Commitment (2014, background): “First, trust is primarily a three-place relation, involving two people and a task: you may trust me to look after your children, to keep a secret, or to tell the truth (Holton 1994, Jones 1996, Hardin 2002, Hieronymi 2008).”
When Can Mediators Build Trust? (2006, background): “Mistrust arises when actors are uncertain about whether the other side prefers to reciprocate cooperation or exploit it (Gambetta 1988; Hardin 2002).”
Repairing and Enhancing Trust: Approaches to Reducing Organizational Trust Deficits (2010, background): “Given this theorized importance of trust for optimal or efficient organizational functioning (e.g., Barber, 1983; Hardin, 2002; Williamson, 1993; Zucker, 1986), a central question in trust research, as noted earlier, has been explicating the foundations for such positive expectations.”
A survey of safety and trustworthiness of deep neural networks: Verification, testing, adversarial attack and defence, and interpretability (2018, background): “Trust is a complex notion, viewed as a belief, attitude, intention or behaviour, and is most generally understood as a subjective evaluation of a truster on a trustee about something in particular, e.g., the completion of a task [Hardin, 2002].”