To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking

By W. Leach, Paul Sabatier. American Political Science Review, 2005

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding Environmental Cognition (2012, background): “Thus, elites with very different underlying beliefs will tend to interpret the same technical arguments differently, leading to mistrust of one another’s motivations and sincerity (Leach & Sabatier, 2005).”
The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem (2009, background): “…beliefs and membership that can result in certain issues coming to the fore on policy agendas, precipitating change by shaping what subsystem members deem to be appropriate types and modes of policy making (Hall 1989, Baumgartner and Jones 1993, 2002, Kingdon 1995, Leach and Sabatier 2005).”
The Ecology of Games as a Theory of Polycentricity: Recent Advances and Future Challenges (2019, background): “Resource distribution is required to establish the distributional fairness of the system, which is ultimately linked to legitimacy, institutional stability, and collaborative behavior (Berardo, 2013; Leach & Sabatier, 2005; Lubell, 2003).”
Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework (2007, background): “consensus on the legitimacy of their collaborative policy process ( Leach and Sabatier 2005: 498).”