Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change

By David L. Cooperrider, D. Whitney. 2005

1,324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a320ad396027a0b370746a567c83b4a5d13edad0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Supporting Students With Severe Disabilities in Inclusive Schools (2015, background): “Appreciative inquiries are exploratory, looking for practices that are right, useful, and successful, to inform the practices of others (Bushe, 2007; Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005; Shaked, 2014; Whitney & Trosten-Bloom, 2010).”
Decision‐making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning culture (2018, background): “Good risk assessment and decision making should be identified, recognised and shared, e.g. by conducting Appreciative Inquiries (Whitney and Cooperrider, 2011) or showcasing good practice (Stevenson, 2017).”
Participatory and appreciative action and reflection (PAAR) – democratizing reflective practices (2008, background): “We have also drawn on more recent work on appreciative inquiry (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005) and appreciative intelligence (Thatchenkery & Metzker, 2006).”
Strength‐based mentoring in pre‐service teacher education: a literature review (2009, unknown): “Positive questioning techniques are employed in AI to uncover existing strengths, hopes and dreams to identify and amplify the positive core of the organization (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005).”
The added value of the positive: A literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations (2013, background): “…positive change core of an organization by collecting stories of organizational successes, developing ideas for a positive future, designing an organization that makes optimal use of the strengths at hand, and setting up action plans for becoming such an organization (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005).”
A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework (2014, unknown): “D technique (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005).”
Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation (2009, background): “The second stream, AI (Cooperrider and Avital, 2004; Cooperrider and Whitney, 2005; Cooperrider et al., 2005; Norum, 2001), has encouraged us to start the development cycle by identifying the different stakeholders’ dreams and visions of how IT can improve and support the lives of people.”
A Five-Dimensional Model of Creativity and its Assessment in Schools (2016, methodology): “Possible approaches to the assessment of creativity were discussed and, using an Appreciative Inquiry approach (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005), methods, which had been used with some degree of success, were explored.”
The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. (2008, background): “(111), appreciative inquiry (19), decolonizing methodologies (120), participatory or democratic evaluation (44), social reconnaissance (114), emancipatory research (25), and forms of action research embracing a participatory philosophy (7, 124).”
Episodic Narrative Interview: Capturing Stories of Experience With a Methods Fusion (2019, background): “Appreciative inquiry is both a generative theory and a pragmatic approach to organizational development that leverages the knowledge gleaned from an organization’s periods of exceptional competence (Cooperrider & Srivastva, 1987; Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005; Watkins & Mohr, 2001).”
PROGRESSION IN STUDENT CREATIVITY IN SCHOOL: FIRST STEPS TOWARDS NEW FORMS OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS (2013, methodology): “After reviewing the literature on creativity and its assessment, CRL consulted expert practitioners using both structured interviews and adopting an appreciative inquiry approach (Cooperrider and Whitney, 2005).”