The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy

By Kelly E. See, E. W. Morrison, Naomi B Rothman, Jack B. Soll. 2011

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2b66bc621410f052328acf935bbeeedd4c177f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Experience versus the Expectations of Power: A Recipe for Altering the Effects of Power on Behavior (2014, background): “Other research has found that the powerful rejected others’ advice and opinions (Galinsky et al. 2008; See et al. 2011; Tost, Gino, and Larrick 2012) and gave less attention to others’ emotions (Galinsky et al.”
An Approach‐Inhibition Model of Employee Silence: The Joint Effects of Personal Sense of Power and Target Openness (2015, methodology): “This manipulation check was similar to ones used in past research (e.g., Lammers, Galinsky, Gordijn, & Otten, 2008; See et al., 2011).”
Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice (2015, methodology): “First, we controlled for accuracy in Task 1, in order to take into account the participants' knowledge about the specific questions asked (See et al., 2011).”
Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decision Making (2013, background): “It is possible that raising public self-consciousness could alleviate potential negative effects of power, such as the tendency to disregard ethical organizational standards (as documented in our Study 4) or ignore useful advice (See et al., 2011; Tost et al., 2011).”
Financial Literacy, Confidence and Financial Advice Seeking (2016, background): “See et al. 2011) argue that as the confidence in one’s judgement rises, the perceived need to incorporate advice will typically fall. nterestingly, studies that use measured financial literacy typically find a positive (or no) relationship, while studies based n self-assessed financial literacy…”
The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy (2013, methodology): “3 We thank See and her colleagues for sharing these data (See et al., 2011).”