Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decision Making

By Marko Pitesa, Stefan Thau. 2013

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this research, we examine when and why organizational environments influence how employees respond to moral issues. Past research proposed that social influences in organizations affect employees' ethical decision making, but did not explain when and why some individuals are affected by the organizational environment and some disregard it. To address this problem, we drew on research on power to propose that power makes people more self-focused, which, in turn, makes them more likely to act upon their preferences and ignore (un)ethical social influences. Using both experimental and field methods, we tested our model across the three main paradigms of social influence: informational influence (Study 1 and 2), normative influence (Study 3), and compliance (Study 4). Results offer converging evidence for our theory.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/676dba6c6c9da3100901ecd3a74ca6f61496c596

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Zhen Wang
  2. Lu Xing
  3. S. Desai
  4. S. Hannah
  5. Maryam Kouchaki
  6. H. Xu

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Zhen Wang
  2. Lu Xing
  3. S. Desai
  4. S. Hannah
  5. Maryam Kouchaki
  6. H. Xu
  7. Dongkyu Kim

In Social Psychology

  1. Zhen Wang
  2. Lu Xing
  3. S. Desai
  4. S. Hannah
  5. Maryam Kouchaki
  6. H. Xu
  7. Bruce J. Avolio

Citations in the corpus