A Matter of Taste: Evaluating Improvised Music

By Jacob Eisenberg, William Forde Thompson. 2003

699 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Music

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1daffa92b02bedb35147fa208a2c7ad83c860e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Music

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains (2011, background): “On the one hand, there has been work on mood induction and creativity (Ashby et al. 1999; Baas et al. 2008; De Dreu et al. 2008; Mumford 2003); on the other hand, researchers have been trying to clarify the role of affect-related normal and psychopathological personality traits in facilitating…”
Antecedents of Business Opportunity Identification and Innovation: Investigating the Interplay of Information Processing and Information Acquisition (2014, background): “…different cognitive processes may underlie idea generation and consequently, they consider divergent thinking to be the end product of more specific cognitive processes, such as conceptual combination/reorganization, analogical reasoning, or abstraction (Mumford, 2003; Ward, 2007; Welling, 2007).”
Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education (2015, background): “The emerging product is seen as the original thought process that occurred and as such is regarded to be the raw creative process (Eisenberg & Thompson, 2003; Nooshin, 2003).”
The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on the Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Disposition of Students in Visual Arts Education. (2018, background): “…have reached a consensus regarding the definition of creativity that is new and useful (Batey, 2012; Batey & Furnham, 2006; Kaufmann & Baer, 2012; Mumford, 2003; Runco, 2007) for generating new ideas, solutions, or answers (Duff, Kurczek, Rubin, Cohen & Tranel, 2013) as related to problem…”
Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity (2008, background): “Nevertheless, the production of an idea or product that is both novel and useful is commonly accepted as a core characteristic of creativity (Barron, 1955; Mumford, 2003).”
From STEM to STEAM: How to Monitor Creativity (2018, background): “A comprehensive definition could focus on the ability to generate novel and useful ideas (Mumford, 2003).”
Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. (2011, background): “For example, it may be productive to conceptually separate intrinsic motivation into multiple elements (e.g., enjoyment, mastery, curiosity, interest) and investigate how each of these elements influences the creative process (Gedo, 1997; Mumford, 2003).”
Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature (2006, background): “Barron (1955) first proposed the new-and-useful definition of creativity, which appears to have gained wide acceptance (Mumford, 2003; Runco, 2004).”
The sociomateriality of creativity in everyday life (2013, background): “As stated by Mumford (2003): Creative thought has served as a foundation, or reference point, for most studies of creativity.”
A synthesis process model of creative thinking in music composition (2005, background): “A synthesis of differing creative process theories is suggested to explain the compositional process observed in the study.”
Contextual Factors and the Creativity of Frontline Employees: The Mediating Effects of Role Stress and Intrinsic Motivation (2011, background): “This gap is significant because different asks may require different skills, motivations, and cogniive strategies (Mumford 2003).”
Problem-Solving and Creativity: Insights from Students’ Individual Composing Pathways (2004, background): “…problem-setting and -solving while thinking convergently and divergently as aspects of creative thinking (Webster, 2003) ensured that we defined exactly what aspects of the creative act were being addressed, a focus deemed important by several writers on creative thinking, including Mumford (2003).”
Individual Differences in Ideational Behavior: Can the Big Five and Psychometric Intelligence Predict Creativity Scores? (2010, background): “However, a recent review of the creativity literature concluded that ‘‘over the course of the last decade, however, we seem to have reached a general agreement that creativity involves the production of novel, useful products’’ (Mumford, 2003, p. 107).”
Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry (2007, background): “The emphasis on divergence as an indicator of creativity can be traced to Guilford’s influential divergent thinking test (Guilford 1956, Mumford 2003).”
Differential Effects of Expected External Evaluation on Different Parts of the Creative Idea Production Process and on Final Product Creativity (2008, background): “In his review of creativity research, Mumford ( 2003 ) suggested that future research needs to pay more attention to “late cycle” creative activities.”
From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the Code? How Creativity & Motivation Interacts with Inquiry-based Learning (2019, background): “A comprehensive definition regards creativity as the ability to generate novel and useful ideas (Mumford, 2003) and as a new, unprecedented and effective method of solving problems (Guilford, 1950).”